![]() That is essentially how a dynamic website works. The entire process will then be repeated for every person that arrives at the kiosk. Finally, the attendant takes the finished paper and serves it to the happy customer. The operator will then pass his rough notes on to a scribbler who will write the final copy to a nice sheet of paper, arrange them in a certain layout and add a few bits and pieces such as the kiosk branding and contact information. When an operator becomes available, they will take the request and phone a long list of news agencies, ask for the latest news and then write the results as bullet points on a piece of paper. The attendant has no way to know what the latest news are, so he passes the request on to a back room full of telephone operators - picture a big telephone switchboard room in the 1950s. ![]() Yes, I know it's silly but it will all make sense in a bit, please bear with me. Try to imagine for a second that the only way for people to know what's happening in the world is to go to the nearby news kiosk and ask to read the latest news. However, alternatives such as Docpad, Hugo and Wintersmith are also widely used and definitely worth investigating. ![]() It's quite a mature product, has a huge community and the big bonus of being natively supported by GitHub pages. The concepts described throughout the article are valid for all static site generators, since they all share the same philosophy, although I'll have Jekyll in mind when I write purely because that's the one I use and have most experience with. With that, you'll hopefully be able to make an informed decision on whether or not a static site can be the solution for your next project. The aim of this article is to help people of all skill levels understand exactly what static site generators are, acknowledge their advantages, and understand if their limitations are a deal-breaker or if, on the contrary, they can be overcome. But actually I think they can be for everyone, just not for everything. I often read on articles about this subject that "static sites are not for everyone", partially due to the lack of a UI to manage content and to the sometimes unfriendly installation process. For over a decade, many different projects - 394 of them, to be more precise - have been maintained by lots of varied people in the community and built with a diverse range of programming languages and technologies. Verdict:Ī great way to take control of your blog even when you don't have access to an internet connection.Static site generators seem to have been becoming more and more popular recently, but they're not one of those ephemeral novelty things that grow in popularity as quickly as they fall into oblivion shortly after. MarsEdit benefits from being significantly easier to use than the vast majority of online blog editing tools, and it's worth taking for a test drive even if you're not looking for offline editing. For the purposes of customisation, the application integrates with BBEdit, SubEthaEdit, TextMate, TextWrangler, and any editor that supports that ODBEditor suite.īeing an offline editor means that you can compose posts wherever you are and upload them later. With rich text and HTML editing modes, the ability to create and use template as well as an impressive media manager, MarsEdit makes it easier than ever to maintain a blog. ![]() Online blog editing can be a slow and frustrating experience, but MarsEdit enables you to connect to your WordPress, Moveable Type, Blogger and many other blogs and edit them using word processor style offline software. While this has obvious advantages such as the ability to compose new posts from any computer with an internet connection, there are also downsides. There are now million of blogs in existence, and the vast majority of them can be edited online.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |